<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Creeva's World 2.0 - Latest Comments in Creative Commons Attribution</title><link>http://creevasworld20.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://creevasworld20.disqus.com/creative_commons_attribution_creevas_world_20/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:12:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Creative Commons Attribution</title><link>http://creeva.com/2008/08/12/creative-commons-attribution/#comment-1718585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes yes it is in a way - but under that same theory public domain would then be communism&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">creeva</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creative Commons Attribution</title><link>http://creeva.com/2008/08/12/creative-commons-attribution/#comment-1718584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;creative commons is socalism&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ghoulishcharm</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>