<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Creeva's World 2.0 - Latest Comments in Does Our Desktop Anti-Virus Protect Us? | Creeva's World 2.0</title><link>http://creevasworld20.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:58:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Does Our Desktop Anti-Virus Protect Us? | Creeva's World 2.0</title><link>http://creeva.com/2008/05/21/does-our-desktop-anti-virus-protect-us/#comment-1718381</link><description>I would go more into it but you know I can't</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Creeva</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Our Desktop Anti-Virus Protect Us? | Creeva's World 2.0</title><link>http://creeva.com/2008/05/21/does-our-desktop-anti-virus-protect-us/#comment-1718380</link><description>""Recently at work there was a security incident where a worker was tricked into loading malware on their machine.""&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;well if that were the case of piggybacked software thats okay  we all been victim to root kits and so on, then should be stated "loaded software with mal-ware" but saying "tricked" implies hornswoggling or douped into  and states that the person was lured by an outside force such as space monkeys with a vendetta against said person &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;as a person who laughs at security breach attempts i just wondered how they were "tricked" &lt;br&gt;im also putting fort a firefox enterprise version if mozillia wants to be a better browser they need such an animal</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ghoulishcharm</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:02:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Our Desktop Anti-Virus Protect Us? | Creeva's World 2.0</title><link>http://creeva.com/2008/05/21/does-our-desktop-anti-virus-protect-us/#comment-1718379</link><description>Well your answer is as follows:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are assuming that the malware has to come from a browser or active-x control.  That is only part of the article I wrote.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is downloaded software that has malware piggy backed in,   E-mail attachments that bypass scanners, sneaker net, attachments from newsgroups.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I only advocate using firefox or a firefox variant you can't always enforce that at an enterprise level for other reasons.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Creeva</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Our Desktop Anti-Virus Protect Us? | Creeva's World 2.0</title><link>http://creeva.com/2008/05/21/does-our-desktop-anti-virus-protect-us/#comment-1718378</link><description>my question is how does someone get tricked into installing mal-ware unless you "click the monkey" or "install this codec" to watch that porn. haven't we been worned about this type of stuff in the past &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;p.s.&lt;br&gt;firefox has mal-ware protection</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ghoulishcharm</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:22:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>