http://creevasworld20.disqus.com/enThu, 03 Sep 2009 11:52:28 -0000http://creeva.com/2008/03/19/inbreeding-genetic-or-moral-law-which-defines-it/#comment-15886493I think people are more attracted to their opposites! Which I think would work better from a evolutionary standpoint.JerriThu, 03 Sep 2009 11:52:28 -0000http://creeva.com/2008/03/19/inbreeding-genetic-or-moral-law-which-defines-it/#comment-14527612I think that you have to be related by birth to call it inbreeding. Other wise there should be no taboo in your relationship. Your thoughts?papa2nncSun, 09 Aug 2009 19:18:15 -0000http://creeva.com/2008/03/19/inbreeding-genetic-or-moral-law-which-defines-it/#comment-12990661Interesting, but for me the both stories is not acceptable.yosTue, 21 Jul 2009 04:54:20 -0000http://creeva.com/2008/03/19/inbreeding-genetic-or-moral-law-which-defines-it/#comment-12926428Very thought provoking. In either case they were not genetically related so there was no crime committed against mother nature, and very iffy against society. In these two cases we need to leave affairs of the heart alone.papa2nncSun, 19 Jul 2009 15:35:12 -0000http://creeva.com/2008/03/19/inbreeding-genetic-or-moral-law-which-defines-it/#comment-12675487Hmm, I like the post! Well, the first story for me it's acceptable since there's no mutual relations between their parents but the other story is not acceptable since their parents got married to each other.clarke59Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:58:32 -0000