Hello! Creeva's World 2.0 is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- creeva.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I am still strangely devastated by this. Like you allude to, I think that he was such a huge part of growing up.
- Still haven't passed 20 =/
- Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!! As I have said before, you being the first meant that you were the experiment. Hopefully I learned from any mistakes. And so far you have survived and prospered in your life....
- So far I have found @roddenberry, Rod the son of Eugene Roddenberry. @WilliamShatner and @ZacharyQuinto
- For some reason the openafs client won't start - it's being back asswards. I think I'm going to end up combining two projects into one and seeing how it goes. I've been meaning to...
Jump to original thread »
Review: Paper Titled "Security Document Theory" by James Moyer | Creeva's World 2.0
Started by creeva · 10 months ago
1 year ago
Addressing your concerns in order...
a.) Frankly, I didn't remember using the word "terrorist" in that second paragraph. I'm not crazy about its use now either, but perhaps it seemed less severe/more relevant in 2003.
b.) As far as I can tell, your proposal of having a MD5 hash is simply to show that the machine readable element is valid. That seems like a lot of work for something that doesn't achieve much.
c.) I guess I did glance over migration period problems. (I would have sworn I mentioned something about it--for instance, once a person knows what a new $100 bill looks like, they might accept them, but they will not necessarily know what they should be looking for in order to know the document is good.)
1 year ago
If anything if you were to revisit and take this paper to the next step in the future just giving you or anyone else following in this direction another point of view on the subject.
Though I still believe in the MD5 hash personally since this could give a degree of larger authenticity on machine readers that would not have a picture display to compare the person to a photo on file.